Tampilkan postingan dengan label John-Ivan Palmer. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label John-Ivan Palmer. Tampilkan semua postingan

John-Ivan Palmer – A heroic epic: male stripper meets mud-wrestler in a hostile world filled with shape-shifters, witches and malevolent king-types

John-Ivan Palmer, Motels of Burning Madness: Confessions of a Male Stripper (The Drill Press, 2009)



"Literary renegade John-Ivan Palmer worked through several male dance agencies to research this satire of strange romance. Huey Dubois, the Hollywood gigolo, can’t say no to a deep obsession for older women. Party girls and jealous husbands clash with hairy male strippers, cross-dressers, and a rich heiress, leading to a final showdown where Huey bares more than just his body. The novel transcends its cast of bizarre characters caught up in their gender circus and becomes a deft dissection of desire itself."



"Throughout history authors have followed careers much different from the nature of their written work. Christopher Marlowe was a spy. Daniel Defoe ran a brickyard. William Empson was a mathematician. Eliot was a banker. Kafka worked for an insurance company. Some, like Genet and Villon, were criminals. John-Ivan Palmer is the only known literary author who is a stage hypnotist. "I am a writer playing the role of hypnotist, not the reverse."

His wide travels and unusual experiences on all levels of society are reflected in the diversity of his highly disciplined work, described variously as authentic, daring and bizarre. His journalism has appeared in large circulation newspapers like the San Francisco Chronicle, Minneapolis Star and Milwaukee Journal. His Pushcart Prize winning poetry and fiction have appeared in Wisconsin Review, New Oregon Review, Other Voices, Broken Streets, and Nth Position. For 13 years he wrote for Your Flesh Quarterly, the premier journal of underground and shock culture. His many interviews, articles and reviews of the latest avant-garde artists and their work were widely read internationally and were mentioned in Newsweek magazine. He interviewed controversial and history-making people like anthropologist Napoleon Chagnon, film-maker Richard Kern, comic book artist Frank Miller, dissident cartoonist Mirko Ilic, manga artist Suehiro Maruo, crime journalist Sondra London and feminist radicals Karen Finley, Annie Sprinkle and Brenda Tattlebaum among many others.

His recent work has featured a literary approach to delusional conscious states such as suggestibility, influence, fascination and control, as in his Motels of Burning Madness. An even greater focus on this theme is the forthcoming Wild Ruins of the Waking Sleep, a collection of linked personal essays which rip the mask off stage hypnotism as it has never been done before."

"Very strong stuff. It got straight to me. Male stripper meets mud-wrestler, what a riot. I can't think of another book of post-modern realism that ever made me laugh so much. The ending took me completely by surprise.” — Richard Kern



“All the revealing stuff you never see in movies about gigolos. A wild, fast-paced romp. Witty, gritty, & marvelously sleazy!” —Sondra London



“John-Ivan Palmer’s effortless writing, narrative flair and rollicking satire are a rare treat. Whether he’s writing fiction or seriously informed non-fiction and reportage, he is in complete control.” —Val Stevenson



“This book knocked me out. It’s the Odyssey, but also the Satyricon. Through it all Palmer maintains an unaffected compassion for everyone. He has spelunked the dank caverns of the human head and come up clean.” —Tom Bradley



"Huey DuBois, the protagonist of this novel, is a male stripper. Accordingly, he starts off wearing nothing but a G-string. By the end, he's covered head-to-toe: sheathed in a clown costume with wig and full greasepaint, on top of which has been thickly layered muck from a swamp he's just slogged through. The bare bone, as it were, of this entertainer's presentation-self, the very tool of his trade, each square centimeter of his epidermis, has gone from total exposure to utter concealment.

Huey DuBois has come to this condition via a trajectory which, in the world of show biz, must be the very definition of downward: from the relatively sanitary ecdysiast scene, to the porno industry, to delivering nudie telegrams, to mud wrestling, and bottoming out as the Bozo we've just seen - or, rather not seen. This is damnation outright for a man formerly so conscientious about his own physical presentability, obsessed with being cologned, pomaded and waxed, as one would expect of a stripper.

As his body gets coated like an ill tongue, his sensorium undergoes a parallel obfuscation. In his terminal clown condition, Huey winds up in a jail cell, peering at the ever-dimming world through a screen of bars, squinting into the smudged glass of a jailhouse television at the further reality filter of videotape. Yet, only now, through such a multiplicity of shades, can our shrouded hero begin to see clearly.

On that videotape he recognizes a person of central importance, to put it mildly. Even though they've been having furtive public semi-sex for weeks, only now does Huey DuBois grasp the ambiguity of this person's gender: a transsexual-in-the-making with breasts, but procreative organ yet unremoved. Lo and behold, he/she happens to be the murderer we've been seeking for most of the book. That blurred videotape exposes the perpetrator of the capital crime our hero's been framed and jailed for.

One of the many amazing things about Motels of Burning Madness is the complete believability of this moment of recognition. Of course, we suddenly realize, it must be mere routine, in Huey DuBois' world, to be naked in and out of bed with someone for weeks on end, and yet fail to notice that he/she just happens to be a her/him. In the series of demimondes and fringe umbras Huey inhabits, the denizens are constantly changing their appearance, wigs, whiskers, piercings, makeup, hair color, disguises, aliases. It's hardly a wise allocation of time to look too closely at such motley protean types. But once he's clapped in Hell with Satan and his minions, Lethe and the Slough of Despond belching their miasma on the periphery, Huey can see through the glass darkly.

Whom else do we know who must go down to Hades before he's permitted to see the truth? John-Ivan Palmer's protagonist is Odysseus, and that makes this novel a heroic epic. If, in these latter days, it's still permitted to wax Jungian, one might point out that Motels of Burning Madness has all the archetypal elements of the epos: the young man lost in a hostile world filled with shape-shifters, horny-making witches and thoroughly malevolent king-types. Leslie Fiedler famously decreed that, as a literary nation, America's function has been to return narrative fiction to its Homeric roots. Even in our present state of utter decline and liquefying rot, we remain the New Adam, and our books reflect this, especially Motels of Burning Madness.

A somewhat later tradition springs also to mind, rather more Roman than Greek. In another context, John-Ivan Palmer has revealed that he got expelled from a Catholic high school for doing a term paper on Nero's 'Arbiter of Elegance'. This is fitting, as Petronius was the Huey DuBois of the first century AD: completely debauched, but possessed of a heart of gold, loyal to his friends as only debauchees can be, straight to the death, and charming and funny right till the last drop of blood is allowed to slip, elegantly, from his veins.

The dinner scene at the home of Trimalchio could have been placed in Motels of Burning Madness, as could the rest of the Satyricon. These low-lifes are presented in the most garish and depraved detail, but through it all shines compassion for everyone - except the mean jerks and power-driven sadists. The poor clown who wants to be awarded with the nose, and gets done out of it, could be waiting table at the freedman's orgy.

John-Ivan Palmer is himself a professional performer before live audiences. The top stage hypnotist in America today, he will make you bark like a dog. He'll suspend you between two chairs and sledge-hammer a cinder brick on your tummy. Simultaneously he memorizes a complete issue of TIME Magazine at a glance, and is quizzed on specific pages by awestruck folks in the audience. So it comes as no surprise that he should possess in spades the uncanny skill of putting his reader-subjects inside his characters' bodies, at wonderful moments and horrible, with intensity and verisimilitude.

John-Ivan Palmer has performed in all kinds of venues, touring Mexico with a low-budget troupe of female impersonators and huffing rubber cement while dodging death squads with Guatemalan street children. He has sojourned in the world’s largest Yugoslavian nudist camp and tracked down the decapitator of Yukio Mishima. He has interviewed and written with unparalleled penetration about such figures as Annie Sprinkle and Richard 'Scumbag' Kern. Our author is clearly no physical coward, but is a man of action, as they say. And that informs every word he writes. The pacing of this novel, the chases and fights and fuck scenes in malls -these are clearly the products not only of literary craft, but personal experience (filtered through, and enhanced by, the eye of fiction, of course).

John-Ivan Palmer is unique in Anglophone letters: a fearless professional spelunker of the human psyche who possesses the talent to climb back out of that fathomless cave and give us a brilliant account of his findings. Motels of Burning Madness is his masterpiece. Jim Chaffee's magisterial Drill Press is to be congratulated and envied for publishing it." - Tom Bradley

Andrei Codrescu - Avant-Post-Dadaism



Andrei Codrescu, The Posthuman Dada Guide (Princeton University Press, 2009)



"Andrei Codrescu's The Posthuman Dada Guide is a history, guidebook, and defense of Dadaism, all spun quite creatively together. Codrescu takes a stab at arranging entries alphabetically-encyclopedically, but there are few entries (and these tend to be essayistic-digressive) and the alphabetical order is made to fit his whims, not only with his choice of subject-matter (e.g. 'kibbitzers') but with the arrangement of names - it's 'hugo, ball' but 'michaux, henri', for example.

'It is not advisable, nor was it ever, to lead a Dada life', Codrescu acknowledges right from the outset, but especially in this 'posthuman' age -- politically and technologically:

you will need Dada as a corrective to what will certainly be the loss of the modicum of liberty you still possess.

Much of the appeal Codrescu finds in Dada is in its resilience and refusal to take itself (or anything) seriously, and he notes that while other fads and movements - from communism to all sorts of art movements - come and go, Dada remains as fresh as ever:

There are, of course, many histories of Dada and, as noted, many dada revivals, but nobody can figure out why Dada won't rust. What's more, what's still live in some of the movements inspired by Dada, whether surrealism, happenings, Fluxus, abstract, or Pop, owe Dada that still-ticking je ne sais quoi and je ne regrette rien. The paradox, of course, is that those movements die to the extent that they become acceptable, while Dada stays both alive and unacceptable. Dada has no style, no taste, and no taste for taste, and, after its meager possessions have been divvied up by museums and collectors, all that is left is what Dada means. (Which is rien, nothing.)

Codrescu chronicles much of Dada's history, and profiles many of the main players, and is particularly intrigued by the idea of Tristan Tzara and Vladimir Lenin facing off at chess in a Zurich café (as they possibly actually did), two representatives of radically different ideologies that had tremendous influence over the course of the twentieth century. The irony that: 'These two people do not agree to society's rules, yet they obey the laws of chess' is just one of the oddities of this clash, which Codrescu milks for all it's worth (fairly cleverly).

There are personal touches and digressions, too. Romanian-born Codrescu makes quite a lot out of the fact that so many of Dadaists were Jews from the Pale region, and he goes into their history, as well as that of Romania. Beyond that he discusses his own classroom experiences as he imparts Dada to his students, and even quotes himself, referring to previous texts he has published. Other lengthy digressions involve such things as the Internet -- or rather: internets, in old and new variations.

Noting that so many of those involved with Dada assumed pseudonyms and new names, one of the clever ideas Codrescu offers is:

For the purposes of this Guide, I suggest that you read it as someone else. Yes, reader, take a reading pseudonym: you will be astonished how interesting it will become, without the intellectual baggage of whatever-your-name-is-now.

A roller-coaster ride of essay(s) and grab-bag of ideas, history, and recollections, The Posthuman Dada Guide is an appropriately loose and shifting piece. It is informative and entertaining, though Codrescu himself is a bit too prominent a figure in the story. But it is good fun (and comes in an appealing and handy pocket-sized format).» - M.A.Orthofer



«Ever want to run naked across a convention floor, pie-hit a bishop, or show up at a job interview in a firecracker hat, screaming poetry until security guards haul you away? Andrei Codrescu's The Posthuman Dada Guide may not be the literal how-to that the title implies, but it will definitely give you the historical and philosophical basis you need to justify a stunt to your cell mates while the authorities figure out what to do with you... Fascinating and indispensible.» - John-Ivan Palmer



«Dada: An absurdist art movement declaring itself against rationality, tradition, and—above all—Dada. Catholic mystic Hugo Ball and poet/impresario Tristan Tzara launched it in Zurich as World War I blazed all around.

Posthuman: A sci-fi term that came of age in the mid-1980s through texts like Donna Haraway's Cyborg Manifesto. It's what we homo sapiens supposedly become when technological enhancements allow us to transcend our biology.

The Posthuman Dada Guide: A hard-edged, rapier-like volume, perfect for sliding into a back pocket of skinny hipster pants or stabbing into the complacent underbelly of bourgeois (or bourgeois-bohemian) society. Authored by NPR commentator and essayist Andrei Codrescu, it offers a headier-than-usual tour of the early-1900s avant-garde, sprinkled with sex appeal for the would-be MySpace-age revolutionary. Jacket blurbs from the likes of Josephine Baker and Aleister Crowley affirm the Guide's period credentials. Meanwhile, the whole thing is a kind of hypertext, composed of cross-referenced 'database' entries—so you can't doubt its cyberpunk legitimacy.

The Guide's Web-savvy structure isn't just a gimmick: It aids in the seamless formation of Codrescu's manic associative trains, which reach to the Middle Ages and back, tracing elements from surrealism to gothic vampire cults, Communist revolutions to Christian carnivals, artists' love for Peggy Guggenheim to differences between American and European witch hunts. This book might've vied with Greil Marcus's Lipstick Traces for the subtitle A Secret History of the Twentieth Century.

As art theory, the Guide could even be preferable to a college seminar on modernism: I'd take its page-long analysis of why poor people make modernist artwork and rich people buy it over Clement Greenberg's classic essay Avant-Garde and Kitsch any day. Codrescu takes potshots at academics' sacred cows, such as the pessimistic notion that 'Dadaism' is obsolete, a corpse to be dissected. He insists it's been alive and well, and he wants to keep it that way.

He also places Dada on a broader historical stage than it usually receives, mingling it with world politics. Hence the book's main framing device: a hypothetical chess game played by Tristan Tzara, the soul of Dada, and Lenin, who apparently gets to represent the Posthuman. It's a tantalizing conceit. In 1916, Lenin plotted revolution just down the road in Zurich from where Tzara (a future fair-weather Stalinist) was helping invent Dada performance at the Cabaret Voltaire. The two men never met, but think if they had! Here, their imagined rivalry dramatizes the struggle Codrescu views as central to the last 100-odd years of Western civilization — between 'mindless, repetitious' mechanization on the one hand and 'drunken,' 'anarchic' spontaneity on the other.

Of course, Tzara and Lenin were both fighting against the tyranny of traditional elites. Yes, Lenin liked mechanization and believed in rationality. The Dadaists' contempt for both of these things, on the other hand, was largely directed at the bourgeois-capitalist war machine; they were hardly anti-socialist. Meanwhile, the Italian Futurist avant-garde — Dada's major contemporary, which barely gets a paragraph from Codrescu — idolized the war machines while still hating rationality, the bourgeoisie, and the Leftists. In other words, Codrescu's categories don't always divide up as neatly as he suggests. In fact, sleight of hand may be involved in some of his key arguments. Nevertheless, he's such an entertaining conjurer that you often just want to let him get away with it.» - Eli Epstein-Deutsch



Label